General NewsIslamNewsRoyaltySouthwestThe Judiciary

Court restrains Oluwo of Iwo from removing, replacing Ogundokun as Bashorun Musulumi of Iwo Land

The Oluwo of Iwo Land, Oba Abdulrasheed Akanbi, has been restrained by an Osun State High Court sitting in Osogbo, the Osun State capital, that he cannot remove Chief Abiola Ogundokun as the Bashorun Musulumi of Iwo Land pending the determination of the main suit.

Ogundokun approached the court after his removal as the Bashorun Musulumi of Iwo Land by the traditional ruler, who also withdrew his traditional titles of Obanla (second in command to the Oluwo) of Iwoland.

Counsel to Chief Ogundokun, Mr. Soji Oyetayo, had argued his application for motion on notice pursuant to Order 38 rule 4 of Osun High Court seeking for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain the monarch and the Chief Imam of Iwoland, Sheikh Fatai Olododo, from removing Ogundokun and to also prevent the respondents from installing another person as Bashorun Musulumi of Iwo Land.

His motion came with a deposition to a 13-paragraph affidavit by Chief Ogundokun as well as a written address and argument in support of the application.

He urged the Judge to grant the application since the respondents, Oba Akanbi and Imam Olododo, had failed to file a counter reply to the application despite the fact that they were served.

Justice Olayinka Ayoola in her ruling restrained the monarch from removing Ogundokun as Bashorun Musulumi of Iwo Land and also prevented the Oluwo from appointing another person to replace Ogundokun.

According to the judgment, “An order is hereby made restraining Oba Abdulrasheed Adewale Akanbi from removing the plaintiff, Chief Abiola Ogundokun as Bashorun Musulumi of Iwoland, appointing, installing and turbaning another Bashorun Musulumi of Iwoland pending the determination of the main suit.”

The judge adjourned the main suit to October 3, 2017 for further hearing.

Counsel to the monarch, Chief Abimbola Ige, did not speak with journalists after the ruling and the monarch too had not made any public statement on the ruling of the court.

Related Articles

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

We noticed you're using an ad blocker. To continue providing you with quality journalism and up-to-date news, we rely on advertising revenue. Please consider disabling your ad blocker while visiting our site. Your support helps us keep the news accessible to everyone.

Thank you for your understanding and support.

Sincerely, Defender Media Limited