Why Gbajabiamila shouldn’t be distracted over PFIPC, PEAC controversy – By Kofo Williams, Abanikanda Olumoro, others
By KEMI KASUMU
“Constructive criticism remains welcome and necessary. However, those seeking accountability must ensure that their interventions are based on facts, proper institutional engagement, and respect for established processes. The pursuit of transparency should unite rather than divide, and public officials should be judged on the basis of evidence, not conjecture.”
A coalition of four prominent Nigerians has urged the public to avoid what it describes as destructive criticism and instead support government efforts aimed at national development, warning against distractions targeting the Chief of Staff to the President, Rt. Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila.
The appeal was contained in a joint statement issued by US-based public affairs commentator Kofo Williams; Chairman of Concerned Nigerians in Diaspora United Kingdom, Abanikanda Olumoro; Convener of the Concerned Fulani People of Nigeria, Alhaji Ibrahim Barkindo Chubado; and leader of the Assembly of Lagos Youths, Comrade Lasisi Robert.
The statement was in response to a video circulating on YouTube, which tend to smear the name of Gbajabiamila over budgetary issues surrounding his disclaimer of a Nigerian accused of impersonating the leadership of the purported Presidential Fiscal and Investment Policy Commission (PFIPC).
According to the group, the allegations were unverified and appeared aiming at tarnishing the image of the Chief of Staff. They argued that such claims should not distract him from his responsibilities in supporting the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
The controversy followed criticisms that the PFIPC, which Gbajabiamila had reportedly disowned, was referenced in the 2026 budget alongside the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC), with a combined allocation of more than N1.3 billion.
Reacting to the development, the authors maintained that any questions regarding the budgetary provisions should be addressed by the National Assembly, which they said is the appropriate institution to clarify the matter.
They called on Nigerians to embrace patriotism by supporting government institutions and avoiding actions capable of undermining public confidence without verified evidence.
According to the statement, “Public service, particularly at the highest levels of government, often comes with intense scrutiny, criticism, and, at times, outright accusations. While accountability remains a cornerstone of democratic governance, it is equally important that public discourse is guided by facts, evidence, and due process rather than speculation or political grandstanding.
“Recent allegations and public statements targeted at the Chief of Staff to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, Rt. Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila, over issues relating to the Presidential Fiscal and Investment Policy Commission (PFIPC) and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC) have once again brought to the fore the need for caution and responsibility in public engagements.
“It is understandable that citizens and stakeholders may raise questions regarding budgetary allocations and the operations of government institutions. However, such concerns should be anchored on verified information and a proper understanding of the budgetary process. Unsubstantiated allegations, particularly those capable of distracting key government officials from their duties, do little to advance transparency or national development.
“Therefore, attempts to drag the Chief of Staff into controversies founded on assumptions rather than facts amount to needless distractions for the Presidency at a time when the administration is focused on implementing critical reforms.
“If critics have reservations regarding how certain agencies or programmes found their way into the national budget, the appropriate institution to seek clarification from is the National Assembly, which possesses the constitutional authority to consider, amend, and pass appropriation bills. The budget process involves multiple layers of scrutiny and legislative input, making it inappropriate to single out an individual without establishing clear evidence of wrongdoing.
“Before raising public alarm over figures linked to a presidential advisory council or any agency reportedly disclaimed by an official, a fundamental question ought to be asked: Which of the entities in question actually has the budgetary allocation? Is it one of them, both of them, or neither? Such basic verification is necessary to avoid misleading the public and creating unnecessary controversies.
“In a democracy, dissent and criticism are legitimate tools for strengthening governance. Yet, these tools lose their value when deployed without adequate fact-checking. Public commentary should enlighten citizens, not inflame passions or create confusion.
“The Office of the Chief of Staff to the President occupies a strategic position in coordinating government activities and supporting the President in delivering on his mandate. At a time when Nigerians expect results in areas such as economic recovery, investment promotion, security, and social development, the nation can ill afford distractions driven by unverified claims.
“Constructive criticism remains welcome and necessary. However, those seeking accountability must ensure that their interventions are based on facts, proper institutional engagement, and respect for established processes. The pursuit of transparency should unite rather than divide, and public officials should be judged on the basis of evidence, not conjecture.
“Ultimately, national progress is best served when public discourse is informed, responsible, and focused on solutions rather than sensationalism,” it said.
