Lagos lawmakers adamant on Meranda, despite Tinubu’s denied yet active order to return Obasa

By KEMI KASUMU

“Why’s no one focusing on the role of Abuja in trying to reinstate him, even with all the infractions and behaving like the elected members must get clearance from Abuja, especially at this stage of our democracy? The matter is being unnecessarily overflogged,” an APC chieftain reportedly said.

Although some presidency sources familiar with happenings in Lagos State have denied the connection of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu with the boldness that ousted Speaker Mudashiru Ajaiyi Obasa displays in his return bid, the new dimension of plot to remove the first woman speaker in the state, Mojisola Lasbat Meranda, is said not to be unconnected with the president wanting to use the Federal Might in achieving but under disguise.

This is as the plot is being tied to Obasa’s camp to remove the incumbent speaker any moment from now.

However, the 32 of the 40 Assembly members, who sacked Obasa, have again, for the umpteenth time, reportedly expressed their unalloyed support for Meranda, not minding whose ox is gored.

According to a media report, after a series of failed attempts to remove Meranda since her emergence on January 13, 2025, there have been a series of permutations to relaunch embattled Obasa to power.

The latest plot is to elect a lawmaker from the West, preferably from Ikeja, after the Ifako-Ijaiye candidate declined the offer, along with others who have restated unalloyed loyalty to Meranda.

APC leaders, with a soft spot for Obasa, are currently plotting to see to the emergence of a proxy speaker from the Ikeja constituency and, after a few weeks, relinquish positions to pave the way for Obasa’s emergence. Obasa, in turn, is expected to resign for a popular candidate as speaker.

But those, who saw allegations of corruption and public office abuse against Obasa as unbefitting for occupant of the office of number three person and who so unseated him in absentia about a month ago, are saying the Tinubu’s denied yet active order to immediately return the ousted speaker is most undoable.

“Why’s no one focusing on the role of Abuja in trying to reinstate him, even with all the infractions and behaving like the elected members must get clearance from Abuja, especially at this stage of our democracy? The matter is being unnecessarily overflogged.

“They even tried to install a proxy to bring him back in a few months.

“Someone making deductions from the allowances of staff, even junior staff, and his colleagues. They behave like they benefit from his negative behaviour,” an APC chieftain lamented under anonymity.

Also, a public critic, Benjamin Mokwunye, in his article “Time to move on,” released at the weekend, said, “There are indications that in one form or the other the Governance (or Governor’s) Advisory Council (GAC) was involved in the removal, perhaps even sanctioning it.

“The council may be an extra-constitutional body, but it has remained influential since it was set up under the Bola Tinubu governorship.

“Soon after Obasa was unseated, his successor, Mojisola Meranda, visited the GAC and received their blessing.

“Their assent, as well as the visit, should have been more nuanced, lest many analysts begin to squirm over the role of the council, even believing erroneously that it was behind the putsch.

“But since the mistake was made, the GAC and the Assembly have battled to sustain the action the state’s lawmakers took against Obasa.

“It has turned out that a few members of the GAC, perhaps three or four out of about 24 have balked at the former speaker’s removal, but regardless of the stridency of their voices and protests, they have been unable to give traction to their reservations.

“There are speculations about APC, hierarchs wanting to return Obasa to his seat, but no one is sure the rumours are not just amateur name-dropping or red herring.

“The procedure adopted by the lawmakers to remove Obasa was democratic.

“His removal over alleged financial misappropriation, misconduct, and high-handedness cannot be downplayed.

“Indeed, the lawmakers could even remove him if they happened to take a dislike to him at any time and any point.

“It is unclear what role the GAC played in the removal beyond merely asserting it.

“If the party and its hierarchs begin to nitpick over such removals, ignoring the sensibilities of the lawmakers and overplaying their hands, they risk alienating the rank and file.

“But public analysts and critics observed that the removal may upset the political permutations of the party, but they would be courting disfavor, if not disaster, to insist on reinstating him.

“If the removal blindsided them, they must find intelligent and democratic ways of closing ranks and regaining control of the party and the legislature.

“Obasa makes it hard for party leaders and members to defend or back him. Regardless of his misunderstanding with Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, his response to the governor’s budget presentation on November 21 exhibited poor judgement and a lack of grace and understanding.

“It is uncertain whether party leaders looked deeper than the surface of his leadership; but the near unanimity of opinion against him by most of his colleagues, past and present, speaks to the poor choice they made of him when they first elected him speaker nearly 10 years ago.

“The GAC and the party must now move beyond Obasa. Their speakership choices have not always been flawless, as evidenced by their election and sustenance of the former speaker.

“It is disturbing that the GAC and the party have hemmed and hawed over a fairly straightforward matter. Mr Sanwo-Olu himself has kept discretely silent so as not to be accused of having a hand in the removal of his combative nemesis,” among others.